Skip to main content

Linux Not The Savior For Our Economy

Robert McMillan, IDG News Service writes....

You knew the argument had to come up sometime: survive the economic down turn by using open source to help you save money. Now Computer World blogger Steve J. Vaughan-Nichols makes that claim in his Linux Will Save Us blog post. The title almost has religious overtones. I found Steve's article thanks to blog posts by Alan Shimel and Michael Farnum. Whether it's iPhones, Linux vs. Microsoft, or Macs vs. PCs, there's always a group who are so overly passionate about their favorite hammer that everything else looks like a nail. I've developed many products on Linux, Windows and some even on Macs, to know that taking your favorite technology too seriously creates other blind spots in your logic and decision making. That said, I can't claim I've never done the same, but hopefully I've learned from those experiences. (My picking on Apple is all in good fun, btw.)

Okay, now back to Steve's post about ditching Microsoft and switching to Linux. There's also the matter of practicality. Yep, Linux software is free, but Linux isn't. Especially converting to Linux. Converting could actually lead to laying off people on your IT staff to get the skills necessary to move to Linux. (I hate it when we refer to employees with impersonal phrases like retool or upgrade.) How about all those ASP.NET and SharePoint applications and the developers who created and support them? And despite up and coming Exchange clones, it's still arguable there isn't really an Exchange replacement that can support large enterprises. An you'll still need to pay for support from Red Hat, Novell or others. How about retraining users so they can be productive on a Linux desktop using Open Office? What's the productivity hit to the business for that? Plus there's the cash outlay to replace all the other software you use (systems management, virtualization, etc.).

Having just returned for Microsoft's Worldwide Partner Conference, I was really struck by the sheer mass of the companies pulled by the wake Microsoft creates in the market. There were partners from all over the world and it seemed there were even more attending WPC from companies located outside the US. Linux also has its mass of companies that follow in the open source's wake and it may even be larger than Microsoft's. I'm sure there is some IDC or other analyst study containing these numbers. We all like to pick on the easy targets, like Microsoft, Cisco and Apple, but the fact of the matter is that competition is good and we all benefit from the fact that commercial and open source technologies are better because of it.

So while Steve's idea for promoting Linux by saving money is thought provoking, the idea's not likely to take a foothold anytime soon. Plus, by the time you converted, the economy would have turned around years before.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Role of Research in Progress and Innovation

  The history of human progress is a testament to the impact of research for the sake of research. Visionaries like Galileo, Isaac Newton, and Albert Einstein have expanded our understanding of the universe by fearlessly pursuing knowledge and sharing their discoveries through academic publications. The scientific method, which promotes the validation of any claim through verification, is a cornerstone of the research process and has driven transformative innovations. Consider the rise of smart cities, which integrate cutting-edge technologies to enhance urban life. Between 2018 and 2021, Singapore produced more than 1,500 research papers on smart cities, while Amsterdam published more than 950 such papers. These contributions demonstrate the critical role research plays in realizing the potential of smart city initiatives. Where ever, there was an attempt to redefine the norm, it was the 'research' that made that happen. Bitcoin, a revolutionary digital currency, emerged from ...

How the "push it" culture creates real "down fall".

In the world of organizational culture, the prevalence of a "push it" mentality often serves as a glaring indicator of more profound issues. It signifies more than just a commitment to excellence; it frequently represents the single most significant indication of an isolated, blame-oriented, and ultimately toxic culture.  In environments where the "push it" mantra prevails, collaboration becomes an afterthought, and leaders, whether consciously or inadvertently, exacerbate this toxicity by embracing this phrase. In this article, I will dive into the perils of the "push it" culture, and I will try to shed some light. If you have been hearing the phrase "you have to push it" or "I expect you to push it harder", that means you are already working in a counterproductive environment.  The Toxicity of "Push It" The "push it" culture, seemingly rooted in the pursuit of results, often conceals deeper organizational maladies....

Google dialogflow - How to train a chatbot to answer questions related to your office and how to make it better than just a Q&A bot?

  First lets look how to do it the basic way. To train a conversational AI chatbot for answering office-related queries using Dialogflow, you will need to follow these steps: Create a new agent in Dialogflow. Collect a dataset of office-related queries and their corresponding answers. This dataset can be obtained through various means, such as scraping websites, conducting surveys, or manually creating a dataset. Create intents in Dialogflow for the queries in your dataset. An intent represents a user's intention, such as asking for office hours or requesting a vacation day. Add training phrases to each intent, which are examples of how a user might ask the question. Provide responses for each intent, which will be the chatbot's answer to the user's query. Test the chatbot using the "Try it now" feature in Dialogflow. Once the chatbot is working well, you can deploy it to a platform of your choice, such as a website or mobile app. However, if you follow the basic ...